APERÇU
Les travaux du thème 1 se sont concentrés sur ces principaux axes de travail:
Nous nous efforçons à présent d'appliquer les connaissances acquises à la question de la gouvernance transfrontalière des services écosystémiques, en mettant l'accent sur le bassin du fleuve Saint-Laurent.
- Comprendre dans quelle mesure et de quelle manière le concept de services écosystémiques a été utilisé dans la prise de décision
- Comprendre et identifier des approches pour soutenir l'engagement de diverses perspectives dans la prise de décision pour les services écosystémiques.
- Développer un cadre pour évaluer la mise en œuvre des résultats de la recherche dans la pratique en utilisant les points d'appui comme lentille, dans le but d'introduire le cadre dans les forums de prise de décision.
Nous nous efforçons à présent d'appliquer les connaissances acquises à la question de la gouvernance transfrontalière des services écosystémiques, en mettant l'accent sur le bassin du fleuve Saint-Laurent.
L’ÉQUIPE DU THÈME 1
Gordon Hickey il/lui CO-DIRECTuer McGill University 
Örjan Bodin COLLABORATEUR Stockholm Resilience Centre 
Derek Armitage COLLABORATEUR University of Waterloo |
Julia Baird elle/elle CO-DIRECTRICE Brock University 
Ryan Bullock COLLABORATEUR University of Winnipeg 
Ryan Plummer COLLABORATEUR Brock University |
Siena Margorian Elle/Elle ÉTUDIANTE À LA MAÎTRISE McGill University 
Alan Diduck Il/Lui COLLABORATEUR University of Winnipeg |
Kiho Hazelton-Cook Il/Lui ÉTUDIANT À LA MAÎTRISE McGill University 
Blane Harvey Il/Lui COLLABORATEUR McGill University |
Gillian Kerr ANCIENNE étudiante |
Imogen Hobbs Elle/Elle ANCIENNE ÉTUDIANTE |
Sherman Farhad aNCIENNE ÉTUDIANTE |
Jen Holzer Elle/Elle ANCIENNE ÉTUDIANTE |
ORGANISATION PARTENAIRE
Environment and Climate Change Canada
PUBLICATIONS EN VEDETTE
Flux 1
|
Ecosystem services decision support tools: exploring the implementation gap in Canada
Kerr, G., Holzer, J., Baird, J. & Hickey, G.
This paper explores the degree to which the ecosystem services (ES) concept and related tools have been integrated and implemented within the Canadian government context at both the provincial/territorial and federal levels.
|
|
The who, what, and how of virtual participation in environmental research
Holzer, J., M., Baird, J., & Hickey, G.M.
This paper explores the degree to which the ecosystem services (ES) concept and related tools have been integrated and implemented within the Canadian government context at both the provincial/territorial and federal levels.
|
|
How is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance? A systematic map protocol
Holzer, J.M., Hobbs, I., Baird, J., & Hickey, G
While the concept of ecosystem services has been widely adopted by scholars and increasingly used in policy and practice, there has been criticism of its usefulness to decision-makers. This systematic map will collect and analyse literature that frames ES as a collaboration tool, rather than as an ecosystem assessment tool, to answer the research question--how is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance and management?
|
Flux 2
|
Pluralism in Ecosystem Governance. Advances in Ecological Research Book Series
Holzer, J.M., Baird, J., & Hickey, G., Eds.
Pluralism in Ecosystem Governance, Volume 66 in the Advances in Ecological Research series, highlights new advances in the field, with this release including chapters on An exploration of the effects of political pluralism on decision making for sustainability: Implications for membership on public sector boards, etc.
|
|
Introduction: Pluralism in ecosystem governance. Advances in Ecological Research, 66: xvii-xxx.
Holzer, J., M., Baird, J., & Hickey, G.M.
This paper explores the degree to which the ecosystem services (ES) concept and related tools have been integrated and implemented within the Canadian government context at both the provincial/territorial and federal levels.
|
|
Measuring the degree of ‘fit’ within social-ecological systems to support local decision-making on flood-risk
Hobbs, I., Lucet, V., Holzer, J.M., Baird, J. & Hickey, G
Social-ecological fit is a promising approach to environmental governance. Its bottom-up,inclusive methodology is particularly needed in the wake of climate change, as decisionmakersmust consider the social consequences as well as the ecological. Social-ecologicalfit, however, is limited by (1) inconsistent terminology in the literature, and (2) a lackof quantitative methods to assess its effectiveness in decision-making.
|